“WINNING THE INTEGRAL GAME?” – an article about conversion and critique
June 8th, 2007
An interesting short article – interesting to me mostly because it is a conversion and disillusionment story, and I think conversion and disillusionment are extremely important and understudied topics in the field of self-development.
Does it say anything new about Ken Wilber? No, I don’t think so, it merely expresses a common arc in the various paths of the student. The attraction to a guru figure, and the inevitable subsequent disillusionment and seperation as the emotional glamour of the original attraction is unfulfilled, as it almost inevitably must be, because the original attraction to a teacher figure and parental figure is part of the nature of the “young mind”, and individuation and seperation is part of the self’s (inherent?) growth patterns.
I thought you might enjoy this fellows story.
“What interests me, personally… is what were the psychological reasons that I was so strongly drawn to Wilber’s work and is my present skepticism of Wilber due strictly to shortcomings in his work or also to a deeper skepticism of comprehensive worldviews in general, discomforting as it may be to wonder?”
“…the primary lesson should be methodological: that it will no longer do for a didactic celebrity to dictate Integral as dogma. It is because everyone is flawed, Wilber and his critics, that the appropriate method for philosophy is dialogue. Dialogue is what separates philosophy from dogma. This is what keeps our beliefs open for debate and reconsideration.”



